See Heckler Documentary on youtube.
See Heckler - Part 1 on youtube.
See Heckler (2007) on youtube.
See 2007 Santa Cruz Heckler on youtube.
See Amy Schumer Takes on a Heckler on youtube.
See Todd Glass Attacks, Punches He on youtube.
See Heckler 2007 Trailer | Documen on youtube.
See Zach Galifianakis Vs. Female H on youtube.
See Arj Barker & heckler on youtube.
See Michael Richards Spews Racial on youtube.
Description: According to the 2010 census, San José de las Salinas, on the north of the Córdoba province, had 662 inhabitants. That sum no longer included Ramón Cáceres, who had died at the hands of his wife and brother-in-law five years before: the only crime in that town’s history. They had gotten married in secret when Cáceres was 77 and she was 33. The situation was covered by the press (mainly because of the wonderful part played by a donkey in its solving) and was soon forgotten. But Distéfano didn’t. Crimen de Las Salinas transcends the news storyline and builds up, even though in the movie it’s everytime daytime, the disturbing portrait of quite a several obscurities.
Description: See Grand Master Helio Gracie's historical wars vs Japanese Jiu-Jitsu champions Kato and Kimura, which took zone in the 1950's. Also watch the 1975 Squad Gracie vs. Squad Karate challenge, which took zone on tile flooring, where Rorion, Relson, and the legendary Rolls Gracie were pitted vs different karate black belts. Plus, Rorion in the first publicized NHB match in the US, where he wars a world-renowned Kickboxing winner who asked to hold his identity unknown. It also contains many wars of Gracie Jiu-Jistu students as well as the grueling match between Rickson Gracie and the feared brawler "King Zulu". Premium Footage includes: The unedited footage of Helio Gracie's classic match with Kato. Also, see what is like a day with Helio Gracie at his ranch in Brazil. Plus, and the young gun Ralek Gracie in his first true fight!
Description: This DVD documents many wars which occurred in the years just prior to Rorion's creation of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Including Royce Gracie's first war with Jason De Lucia (The second match was in UFC II) and the Hapkido master who wars Rorion can't seem to understand why he keeps getting choked out. You will also see Royler and Royce Gracie compete in black belt judo tournaments and prove repeatedly that Gracie Jiu-Jitsu is more than just a sport. Also included are some of Rickson Gracie's fights, one vs a Russian which took zone at the Gracie Academy and the another is the classic war of his, on the beach in Rio de Janeiro. Premium Footage Ryron and Rener of the fresh generation of Gracie's, competing in wonderful matches vs some of today's greatest grapplers: "King of the Cage" winner Joe Stevenson, Jiu-Jitsu Globe Winner Cassio Werneck, Todd Margolis and much more!
Description: Twin Latino filmmakers adventure over 8,000 miles to show a nuanced look at the promise, and the problems, of one of America's most marginalized yet strong communities - the 23 million Latinos who are U.S. citizens, and eligible to vote in local and national elections.
Description: THEY'RE BACK! (And their fronts.) Plus their sexy personalities! You'll flip over this video. Produced by Bob Michelucci, directed by John Russo and photographed by PLAYBOY Photographer Dan Golden, it's an eye- popping mixture of cheesecake, bikini exercise routines and intimate interviews with starlets Veronica Carothers, Melissa Moore and Jasae.
Description: There is no God. Actually what? If this is the only life we have, how does that affect how we live our lives, how we treat every other, and cope with death. As a follow-up to one of Kickstarter’s most successful publishing projects, photographer and filmmaker Chris Johnson introduces us to some of the many voices from his book. In this fascinating documentary — learn the stories behind the ebook in interviews with some of our best thinkers. Join Chris as he explores problems of joy & meaning and travels around the world meeting folks from all walks of life and backgrounds who challenge the false stereotypes of atheists as immoral and evil. From Daniel Dennett and A.C. Grayling, to Julia Sweeney and Robert Llewellyn —learn the different methods many atheists have left religion to a better life filled with love, compassion, hope, and wonder.
Description: The storyline of an Afro-Cuban group who kept alive songs and dances their ancestor had brought aboard the slave ship from Africa. They were so specific that around 200 years later, a village of Africans watched them, joined in singing, and told simply, joyously: "They Are We". This movie says the storyline of how they found every another and how they work to be able to reunite.
Description: The movie reveals the inventiveness derived from the dialogue between every artist's practice and the construction of their handmade homes. The effects range from the romantic (Hudson River School painter Frederic Church's Olana, framing views of the Catskills to echo his paintings), to the futuristic (Urbanist Paolo Soleri's silt-casted structure Cosanti growing out of experiments in bell making in the Arizona desert). Commentary from cultural critic Alastair Gordon and an original score by Jamie Rudolph support to evoke the spiritual dimension of the territories and argue the situation that the intuitive vision of artists can make nice architecture.
Description: Argentina, 1933. The Mexican painter, David Alfaro Siqueiros, paints the mural "Plastic Exercise" in the basement of the mansion of Natalio Botana, an Argentinean tycoon. 70 years after, we plunge in the itinerary of this piece that, dismantled, is locked in five containers at the mercy of the weather.
Description: This work explores the unknown participation of Congolese intellectuals in the Situationist International movement, especially the student M'Belolo who wrote a protest song in May 1968.
Description: Shot in Las Vegas, Nevada and at the Chiller Theater horror/sci-fi convention, this documentary from director Lou Vockell profiles two things boys love - quick vehicles and pretty women. Take a scenic tour of a Corvette enthusiasts gathering while getting a peak at such erotic B-movie luminaries as Debbie Rochon, Linnea Quigley and Glori-Anne Gilbert. Also included is a full length glamour video featuring the lovely Renee'.
Description: From Romance to Ritual invokes and inverts the game of the 1920 ebook by Jessie L. Weston, as it like the book, draws connections between pagan history and ritual and mythology.
Description: A compilation of movies and images by Stern featured on BBC4 as part of a series of programmes curated by Keith Richards and Julien Temple, known collectively as Keith Richards' Lost Weekend
Description: Modern meteorology and a hard-working government weather squad place their science and organization to work as a cold front moves from Alaska toward the citrus groves of Southern California. First, the scientists predict the storm's course, giving few days' warning to farmers and growers. The growers, typified by the Morgan family, prepare the oil-burning pots throughout their grove. Then, as the temperature dips below freezing, they light the pots. The cold snap continues as oil-supplies dwindle; the smoky air slows traffic, including trucks bringing more oil. The scientists strive to predict how long freezing temperatures will last: can the Morgans keep out?
Description: A short in the WB Hollywood Novelty series (production number 7301) about the training of polo ponies. Buddy Rogers buys one of the ponies in training, and soon uses him in a match where Jack Holt and Joe E. Brown are among the players. Edward G. Robinson and Jack Oakie are among the spectators who see Joe. E. Brown knock in the winning score.
Description: Pola Negri, Bebe Daniels, Mitzi Green, Polly Moran, Mack Sennett and Marjorie Beebe are seen relaxing at Palm Springs, a California winter resort; Barbara Stanwyck and Ricardo Cortez enjoy golf; another celebrities are shown in Malibu Beach.
Description: This short movie celebrates the difficult work, tenacity, and ingenuity of inventors. Highlighted are some seemingly tiny inventions that have become part of everyday life.
Description: Bath of life IThere are promises that are impossible to keep. My uncle José made such a promise as a kid in 1963 to my mother Ana Luisa, to whom he declared a unique type of devotion. There are everytime bonds like this between siblings establishing mysterious complicites. This is what José declared to tiny Ana Luisa: "The day that you die, I´m going to die with you".
Description: Relationships with the folks you love most are often the most complicated. This is the trouble Hania and her mother Ewa face during their sessions with a psychotherapist, filmed intimately and with the utmost respect by director Paweł Łoziński. The camera everytime focuses on one person at a time, revealing each emotion hidden behind the words and silences. The empathetic therapist carefully but purposefully peels away the difficult layers under which mother and daughter shield themselves. Tiny by little, the private tragedies that hamper their communication rise to the surface, as well as the source of the longing for love and acknowledgement that they search so difficult to fulfill.
Description: A short experimental documentary about human senses – what happens when one of them is missing and all others merge to replace it? The movie will discover the intensity of these senses through the perception of a disabled dancer.
Description: 24 October 2015, a great day in autumn in a great landscape. A crowd of refugees and migrants accompanied by troops and police officers create their method from the Schengen border between Slovenia and Croatia towards the refugee camp in Brežice. Suddenly, the landscape begins to appear less great than it was.
Description: A wild boy in wilderness is nothing extraordinary, it is something easy imagined. But how to live in wilderness as an urban, civilised person? How to strike a balance between harmony with nature and participation in the society – without fear, cynicism, regret, frustration? How to retain your dignity in difference? How to live with less without any sacrifice? This is a storyline of a boy who has taken fate into his own hands, radically reducing his dependence on dispensable essential material possessions of the modern society without cutting off his participation in it. This is a storyline of Nara, Nara Petrovič – Human.
Description: A video documentary/road trip that celebrates the drive-in film theater's impact on the United States, and pays homage to the folks who hold the several remaining ones totally operational. Details interviews with horror film maker John Carpenter, film critic John I. Bloom (aka "Joe Bob Briggs"), Michael Wallis, creator of "Route 66: The Mother Road," and others.
Description: The documentary movie "Mr. Dial Has Something to Say" investigates the trouble of classism and racism in the elite American art world. By following the dramatic, disturbing storyline of Thornton Dial, a 79-year-old American-African artist from Alabama's Black Belt.
Description: The storyline of American POWs, who were surrendered in the Philippines to the Japanese Army, then sent to slave labor camps in the northern Chinese town of Mukden (now Shenyang).
Description: Negative media coverage on the never-ending whaling trouble prompted first-time documentary filmmaker Keiko Yagi to search out more about the topic. With no budget, limited experience in filmmaking, no fluency in English, but armed with a video camera and a powerful desire to search out about the truth of the matter on whaling, Yagi started her research.
Movies Like Studio 5 2016
Movies Like Scroll on Thru 2017
Movies Like Pássaro preto 2016
Movies Like Affæren Birte 1945
Movies Like Le gagnant 1979
Movies Like Across Grace Alley 2013
Movies Like Fear Is The Master 1983
Movies Like Palos y risas 2016
Movies Like Sex O'Clock U.S.A. 1976
Movies Like Ta' briller paa 1942
Movies Like Liberdade, essa palavra 2006
Movies Like The Snow Hawk 1925
Movies Like Karen, Maren og Mette 1954
Movies Like Tulay Buhay 2017
In this documentary, Jamie Kennedy tells that film critics could create a mission of giving "constructive criticism," that is, instead of just telling that a film sucked, tell why it was terrible and what should have been done to create it better. This is one of the parts that I accept with, so I'll test to do that here.The first 20 mins or so were exactly what the DVD cover and game claim to be- a documentary about how stand-up comedians deal with hecklers. Listening to the comedians' fight stories and ways of dealing with hecklers is hilarious and a fascinating subject.But then the film veers off course when Kennedy makes a ham-fisted comparison equating film critics to hecklers. Plenty of others here have explained why that's a terrible comparison, so I don't need to explain why again.From that mission on, it feels like the film is nothing but JK whining that no one liked Son of the Mask. I'm a bit bitter about the bait-and-switch done here. He shows us a brief clip of SotM that's supposed to convince us that the entire thing is funny, and assumes that this gets us 100% on board with his belief that everyone who criticized it is fully wrong and/or mean-spirited. And EVERYONE he finds either didn't watch it or didn't like it. He mopes around between sadness and anger, never once stopping to consider that just maybe Son of the Mask really was a terrible film.In fact, he seems to be really stuck on the concept that there is no such thing as a terrible movie whatsoever. Kennedy argues that because each opinion on a film is just an opinion, not a fact. However, most folks would accept that if a movie is universally hated by both professional critics and the viewing public, tanks at the box office, and gets singled out by Rotten Tomatoes as one of the 100 worst movies of the decade, as Son of the Mask was, then it's a cute secure bet to call it a terrible movie. There is such a thing as a terrible film.He has some valid points about how mean-spirited and personal-level criticisms of movies are excessively cruel, but these points seem to receive lost in the mess of the post-heckler part of the movie. It's unfocused and has a lot of logical leaps. One minute all film critics are scum, the next minute Roger Ebert is a nice and well-respected exception (even though he's just as popular for tearing into truly terrible movies as writing nice reviews), the next we see some child telling that Ebert is an idiot and an out-of-context clip that makes Beyond the Valley of the Dolls look really bad, fully missing the mission that that movie was intentionally schlocky. One minute a professional film critic is a valid career with a legitimate purpose, the next they're all scum again. One minute he's accepting of the concept of creative criticism that doesn't attack on a private level, the next 25 minutes, no one could ever have a negative opinion about anything.We're treated to a parade of popular flop-makers that we're supposed to feel sympathy for, but don't, because we're still not convinced that there's no such thing as a terrible movie. Bringing in folks involved with incredibly terrible films like Joel Schumaker, Carrot Top, and Uwe Boll to argue your mission only further cements the concept that your film was terrible and that you're just being bitter about everyone's natural reaction to it.However, I thought that the part about how the Web has made everyone into an elitist critic with a tendency to hate everything was interesting ("0 out of 4 waffles?"). I search folks who come to IMDb, give a good-but-not-great film 0/10 stars and a review of "THIS WUZ The WURST MUVEE EVER LOLz!" to be some of the largest morons on the planet, and their opinions to be about as worthless as he tells they are. JK also has an interesting concept where he confronts some of his harshest, most personal-level critics to see if they'll tell the same things to his face. But his reaction to one of those is so terribly immature and unfunny (and I'm no prude) that it ruins the entire exercise.In conclusion, I think that Kennedy made this movie too soon. His emotions about everyone's reaction to Son of the Mask were still too raw, and that got in the method of his ability to create a coherent documentary. Had he made it two or three years later, he probably would have been thinking clearly enough to leave out some of the moments that I'm sure felt gratifying to him, but just alienated his audience, like his contradictory opinions on Ebert or his treatment of the last critic he met in person.
It's a tiny weird and very ironic - to review Heckler, a documentary that speaks out specifically on movie criticism. Despite the game and promotional materials suggesting that it focuses on those who heckle stand up comedians, the movie has a change of heart half method through, switching its efforts over to berating movie critics. Therein lies one of the bigger issues with Heckler: the two subject don't have much to do with one another, despite Jamie Kennedy's, the star of the film, attempts at correlating them. Besides this major flaw, Heckler is an entertaining film. Personally, I disagree with nearly each mission of view featured within Heckler, but the movie held my interest, containing what gotta be hundreds of various interviews with celebrities.The first half of Heckler focuses primarily on audience members at stand-up comedy shows who take it upon themselves to interrupt the performance, insult the comedian, or occasionally even test and steal the spotlight by finishing the jokes. While this may not seem like a large trouble to most, the movie demonstrates how hecklers have become an increasingly huge trouble for stand up comedians. Interviews with a myriad of celebrity comedians, including David Cross, Bill Maher and Tom Green among others, present the frustrations, self-doubt and career repercussions comedians face because of unruly patrons. Heckler also documents some of the more extreme situations as well, including an assault on a stand-up by an offended viewer, a musician who smashes his guitar over an unruly mans head, and the infamous Michael Richards incident. This portion of Heckler does a nice job of shedding light on an trouble most folks have never given a second-thought to.This is later abandoned in favor of bashing movie critics, especially, but not limited to, the internet kind. There are a several legitimate points made about criticism, particularly how in the "internet" age, more attention is focused on deriding and humiliating the actors/directors who created the film, then critiquing the movie itself. While this does present a gradual decrease in the quality of movie criticism over the years, it's still very hard to sympathize with the different movie directors interviewed within the film, who all seem to take movie criticisms, and the tiny jabs that come with many of them, method too far. Anyone working within the entertainment business has to have thick skin, it comes with the job. One of these featured directors is Paul Chilsen, who supposedly dropped out of film-making because his first detail got terrible reviews. This isn't the fault of the critics; he simply wasn't slash out for the business.However, no performer featured in Heckler comes across as infantile and whiny as the star of the movie himself, Jamie Kennedy. It's a wonder the boy ever made it through high school, as it is frequently demonstrated throughout the movie that he is unable to take the slightest criticisms of his work. When confronting two teenage hecklers, Kennedy doesn't seem to care about the fact that his present was disrupted; his only concern seems to be that they didn't search it funny, as he starts to tell "What do you know about comedy? Who are you to decide what's funny". They're your audience, Jamie. They paid cash to see your show, and while they don't have a right to crash it for others, they have each right to decide whether it's funny or not. If you don't feel like folks could judge your work, perhaps you shouldn't be performing it for them.Kennedy also starts meeting with critics who have given his last detail film, Son of the Mask, a terrible review. It becomes more apparent that Kennedy just can't agree the fact that folks dislike it or another movies of his. He blames others for his own failures as an actor/writer. It's not just the insulting reviews that Kennedy has a trouble with: he has a trouble with any review that speaks negatively of the film. In Kennedy's dream world, everyone would be forced to play each single piece of art out there, for fear of upsetting the artists. Kennedy takes offense to Richard Roeper's review stating he wanted to walk out of Son of the Mask. The ensuing confrontation is hilarious, as Kennedy attempts to change Roeper's mind by telling in all seriousness that the film was trying to push fresh boundaries...by having a baby with super powers who should throw people. In other scene, Kennedy confronts a critic, Peter Grumbine, who seems to search Jamie's overreaction rather funny. At the end of the exchange, Jamie now calls Grumbine evil, putting someone who dislikes his movie among the ranks of Hitler, Charles Manson and Osama Bin Laden. Even if you still have the slightest doubt after watching the film that Kennedy is overreacting, the deleted scenes could clear everything up: Kennedy freaks out on a mate who merely told one of his comedy bits didn't work.Perhaps the most alarming thing is many of the director's insistence that no one has the right to judge their work, that anyone who speaks negatively of their work misunderstands it. It shows a finished lack of consideration for the audience, and makes one wonder why these self-proclaimed masters of movie even bother showing their work to audiences if they don't care about the reaction. The one exception is Uwe Boll, possibly the most hated boy in the film-making business. While he does have an organized boxing bout with critics in the movie, letting off a bit of steam, he never once speaks out vs movie criticism. Perhaps this is why someone like Boll is increasingly getting better (his two recent films have had some support) while folks like Jamie Kennedy, Joel Schumacher and Eli Roth are continuously getting worse and worse. In the end, it's not movie criticism that's destroying the movie business, but Kennedy's (and others) inability to learn from the criticism.
I have never written a movie review here before, but Heckler now compelled me to do so. One thing I gleaned from the film was an appeal to critics: Don't be mean for the sake of being mean. Instead, create the criticism constructive. I aim to do that here.I will begin by telling I really enjoyed hearing the perspective of all the performers and artists on the topics of heckling and criticism. Since the interview topics are funny and talented people, the resulting string of talking heads is now quite entertaining. As for the topics matter, I have everytime been sympathetic towards comedians who have to endure hecklers while on stage, but this film really hit the mission home. Also interesting was the footage of current heckling incidents, and the sometimes shocking reactions from the performer.Jamie Kennedy, the de facto host of the movie, was nice for the most part, but some sequences were more effective than others. He was at his greatest when his humor was self-deprecating. When Jamie confronted a critic, read their review out loud, and then sat there with a sort of deflated, forlorn look on his face as the critic continued to insult him, that was nice stuff. But when he went on the attack, such as insulting one guy's babysitting job, or asking a critic about his sex life, he was turning into the very mean-spirited critic that he had been admonishing. If he instead became the better person, and turned the another cheek, he would have been a more sympathetic (and funnier) character. Still, his performance overall was good.As for the treatment of movie criticism, I felt like there required to be more balance. There could have been some acknowledgment that movie critics deliever a valuable source of consumer information. When I go to see a movie, I have to create a 1/2 hour to 1 hour drive, sometimes pay for parking, pay $10 or more admission, and devote 2 hours of my life to watching it. Before doing so, I would like to know if it is worth the money, time, and effort. Movie reviews are an essential software in making this determination. I am a consumer, and a film is a product I am purchasing. How is it any various from reading reviews for any another product before buying it? Why are vehicle reviewers not berated for what they do? How about Consumer Reports, which reviews just about any product you can think of? As for internet reviewers, how about the customer reviews on amazon.com, or rei.com, or any major internet retail site? They may not be professional reviewers, but their opinions can be meaningful in huge numbers. When 100 owners give something a nice (or bad) review, that is helpful notification if I am thinking of buying that product. I think it is also a false argument to recommend that movie critics lack credibility because most of them have never made a movie themselves. Back to the vehicle reviewer analogy, I bet most of them have never manufactured cars, but they have driven enough of them to separate a finely tuned machine from a lemon.So, while I enjoyed Heckler overall, I couldn't support but leave a tiny disappointed knowing it should have been much better if it was made with a tiny less hostility and a tiny more thoughtfulness. With this approach, I think these filmmakers should turn a nice film into a nice one.
New York, NY 10013
Similar Film Search Engine
+44 20 7336 8898
Mon - Sun 09:30 am - 05:30 pm